(This is one of my old Google Notes.)
In the software architecture, one component (caller) is relying on some services provided by another component (callee). Before the caller can use the service of the caller, the caller must hold an instance of the callee. There are several ways to do it.
First, the caller can create an instance of the callee. Sometimes, only one instance of the callee is preferred to exist in the whole system, because it is unique or it is expensive to create, e.g., the database manager. In that case, the singleton pattern can be used. But there are some shortcomings with the singleton pattern. First, because the callee has to implement the singleton pattern and the callers have to invoke the singleton pattern in a proper way, the code of solving dependency is scattering around the whole system. Second, it is inflexible to replace a callee component with one of the same interface.
Second, the caller can go to a "service locator", then use, for instance, a JNDI directory to locate callees. Though the service locator maintains a central place of managing all service providers (callees), the caller still needs to know how to talk to the service locator.
Third, this is state-of-the-art: dependency injection, which is implemented in many frameworks, such as Spring and Google Guice. Compared to the above two approaches, the advantages of dependency injection are obvious. Both caller and callee can be POJO (Plain Old Java Object), with no special control implemented. And there is a single control point. In Spring, that is the Spring XML configuration file. Thus the dependency is solved in a declarative way! Nowadays we always prefer a declarative way to a programmatic way to do things.
In a service-oriented architecture, service workflow is a multi-component system. Any component service can be a caller, a callee, or both. There is some similarity between dependency injection and how a workflow is composed: both have a central control point for solving dependency in a declarative way. In workflow, that is the workflow description file, e.g., written using BPEL. On the other hand, in service-oriented architecture, the service registry shares a similar idea as the service locator pattern.
Sunday, November 02, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment